CANADIAN MODEL OF OCCUPATIONAL PERFORMANCE / CANADIAN MODEL OF OCCUPATION PERFORMANCE - ENGAGEMENT
CANADIAN MODEL OF OCCUPATIONAL
PERFORMANCE
1.
HISTORY:
·
This model previously known as Canadian
guidelines for client centered practice was originally devised in 1982 by a
task force supported by Canadian association of occupational therapist and the
department of national health and welfare and following revision in 1983 and
later in 1997 was renamed the Canadian model of occupational performance.
·
The model is essentially base on a
client –centred philosophy viewing the
client value and belief as the core ,giving meaning to activity recognizing the
human skills that contribute to performance and the range of performance area
all of which are surrounded and influenced by the impact of the environment.
·
Occupational performance is the result
of a dynamic relationship between persons ,enviorment and occupation over a
lifespan.
2.
ASSUMPTIONS:
·
The model is based on the assumption and
core beliefs of the profession. it is also informed by the principles of client
centeredness .
·
Another assumption that informs the
model is that occupation are contextually and developmentally influenced.
·
It is based on the assumption that
occupation the domain of concern for occupational therapists is the bridge that
connects person and environment .
3.
ELEMENTS
OF OCCUPATIONAL PPERFORMANCE:
·
Components
of performance
Ø Physical
Ø Cognitive
Ø Affecttive
Ø spiritually
·
Components
of occupation
Ø Self-care
Ø Productivity
Ø leisure
·
The
environment influences
Ø Physical
Ø Cultural
Ø Social
Ø Institutional
3.1. The performance is carried out
through the three following component:
·
Doing –physical components which
comprise motor ,sensory and sensorimotor skills
·
Thinking-cognitive components of intellect ,perception, comprehension,
concentration, judgment, and reasoning
·
Feeling-affective components related to
emotional and social areas in personal and interpersonal relationships
3.2. Occupation
·
CAOT {The Canadian Association of
Occupational Therapist} defines self-care as occupations for looking after the
self. which includes all the activities necessary for self-care and self
-management
·
Productivity is defined as occupations
that make a social or economic contribution or that provide for economic
sustenance. This includes those activities
that enable individuals to consider themselves productive whether or not
there is any end product or financial reward involved
·
Leisure is defined as occupations for
enjoyment
3.3. Environment
·
The cultural
environment fluctuates and is different for each individual. Many issues that
have an impact on a therapeutic intervention are culturally determined, including beliefs, values, customs, patterns of
authority, how decisions are made and individual roles.
·
The physical environment can be seen as
both a barrier and a support for individuals' participation in their community.
Physical range composed of natural
surrroundings –buildings ,equipment, roads, trees, weather ,nature, climate and
technology
·
The social environment is composed of
social groups such as family, coworkers and friends and their roles, as well as
occupational forms such as playing cards or jogging. Social environment including social priorities with in the community
,social groups , common interests ,attitude ,beliefs and relationships.
·
The institutional environment includes
legal elements that often overlap with the economic one as control of funds and
who makes financial decisions often become legal matters, which determines policies ,procedures and
practices and includes such as legal,
political and economic elements.
4.
APPLICATION
IN OCCUPATIONAL THRRAPY:
·
The application of the model of
occupational performance is best seen in the practical use of the Canadian occupational
performance measure {COPM}- assessment that acts as a clinical measure of
client s self –perception of occupational performance.
·
The COPM is a client – centred semi –structured
interview and self- rating assessment.
·
The strength of this model is its client
–centered approach and clearly articulated focus on occupation and occupational
performance.
5.
THE
APPLICATION OF THE MODEL IN PRACTICE:
·
Stage-1 : Name , validate and prioritise
occupational performance issuses with the client in areas of self-care
,productivity and leisure
·
Stage -2: Select theoretical approach or
approaches with the client to address the issues identified
·
Stage -3 : Identify occupational
performance components and environmental conditions that are contributing to
the performance issue
·
Stage -4 : Identify the clients personal
strengths and environmental resources
and the therapist s experience ,expertise and resources
·
Stage -5: Negotiate targeted outcome and
develop an action plan .this specifics
what the client and occupational therapist will do to resolve or minimize limitations to occupational
performance in order to achieve the targeted outcomes
·
Stage -6: Implement plans through
occupation
·
Stage -7: Evaluate occupational
performance outcomes .this may result in completion of the intervention if the
targets are achieved review of the
activities or the targets have not been achieved or continuation if this is still
beneficial to the client
6.
FUNCTION
–DYSFUNCTION:
·
Function is denoted by harmonious
interdependent relationship between the person ,occupation and environment
·
A
change in one component results in a change all the dimension due to the
interdependent relationship between them therefore a disruption in one
component can in occupational dysfunction
CANADIAN MODEL OF OCCUPATION PERFORMANCE - ENGAGEMENT
1.
BACKGROUND:
·
Development from the Canadian model of occupational
performance {CMOP}.
·
Captures the occupational perspective of
human occupation.
·
Positions profession beyond the medical model.
·
Envisions health ,well-being and justice
as attainable through occupation .
·
Introduces engagement as an important
construct in understanding human occupation.
2.
THERORY
REGARDING ORDER –DISORDER:
2.1.Order
·
Occupational order hass six perspectives
–physical rehabilitative , psychological emotional, socio-adaptive, neurointegrative,
developmental or environmental- in relation to the arbitrary performance area
of self care ,leisure and productivity.
·
Quality of function is assessed in term
of both performance and satisfaction.
2.2.Disorder
·
The dimension of person ,occupation or
environment or when the momentrum of experience is lost due to unresolved
issues.
3.
ASSUMPTIONS:
·
Based on shared assumptions the
profession
·
Client –centredness is key
4.
THEORIES
THAT INFORM CMOP-E:
·
Humanistic theories –client centered
principles
·
Development theories – adaptation and development
of occupation roles
·
Environmental theories- the influence of
environment on occupation and the person
5.
FOCUS
OF MODEL:
·
Occupational performance.
·
Occupational engagement.
·
Both are a result of a dynamic
interaction between components of the model.
·
Presents a transverse view of the model
that situates occupation as the core focus of the profession.
6.
AIMS:
·
To improve transactions between person
,occupation ,environment, through the process of enablement rather than
treatment.
·
Enablement involves working with clients
to facilitate autonomy and does not focus primarily on performance components.
7.
ENGAGEMENT:
·
Refers to all that people do to become
occupied.
·
Speaks to occupying self or others.
·
Presents a broader view of human
occupation.
·
Relates to having occupations and not
only performing them.
8.
COMPONENTS
OF CMOP-E:
8.1.Person
·
With spirituality as the core of the
person
·
Components of performance
Ø Physical
Ø Cognitive
Ø Affective
8.2.Occupation
·
Link between the person and the
environment
·
Components of occupation
Ø Self-care
Ø Productivity
Ø leisure
8.3.Environment
·
Present occupational opportunities
·
The environment influences
Ø Physical
Ø Cultural
Ø Social
Ø Institutional
9.
FUNCTION
–DYSFUNCTION:
·
Limitations with in the person –
decreased performance.
·
Limited occupational opportunities – limited
occupational engagement.
·
Harmonious relationship between
component – optimal performance and engagement.
·
An unsupportive environment –decreased
performance and engagement.
·
Change
in one component – change in another component.
10. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE:
·
Allows for use with other frameworks
·
Can be used across age groups
·
Can be applied to various diagnoses
·
Promotes client –centredness
·
Can be used in multicultural settings
·
Directs focus of practice on creating
environments that are occupationally supportive
·
Means t hrough which health and
well-being may be attained
Comments