TASK-ORIENTED APPROACH
TASK-ORIENTED APPROACH
1.
DEFINITION:
·
Movement is organized around a
behavioural goal and is constrained by the environment
·
Patients learn by actively attempting to
solve the movement problem rather than by repetitively practicing normal
patterns of movement
2.
ASSUMTION:
·
Personal and environmental systems,
including the central nervous system, are hierarchically organized.
·
Functional tasks help organize behavior.
·
Occupational performance emerges from
the interaction of persons and his or her environment.
·
Experimentation with various strategies
leads to optimal solutions to motor problems.
·
Recovery is variable because patient
factors and environmental contexts are unique.
·
Behavioral changes reflect attempts to
compensate and to achieve task performance.
3.
THEROY:
·
The assumptions and propositions of
theories of motor development and motor behavior changes therapist were using
interventions based on assumption such as
ü The
CNS is hierarchically organized
ü Normal
movement can be facilitated by providing specific patterns of sensory input
ü Recovery
from brain damage follows a predictable sequence
·
Occupational therapy task oriented
approach includes assumption and propositions from broad occupational theories
a systems
model of motor control, an ecological approach to perception And action and
dynamic systems theory
·
Motor control and learning from the
neuropsychological ,biomechanical and behavioural sciences
3.1.Systems
Model of Motor
·
The systems model of motor control is
more interactive or heterarchical and emphasizes the role of the environment
more than the earlier reflex-hierarchical model.
·
The nervous system itself is organized
heterarchically such that higher centers interact with the lower centers but do
not control them. Closed-loop and open-loop systems work cooperatively and both
feedback and feedforward control are used to achieve task goals
·
The central nervous system (CNS)
interacts with multiple personal and environmental system As a person attempt
to pursue the goal
3.2.Ecological
approach to perception And action
·
Emphasizes the study of interaction
between the person and the environment during everyday, functional tasks and
the close linkage between perception and action (i.e., purposeful movement).
·
The role of functional goals and the
environment in the relationship between perception and action.
·
Higher centers send down a command for a
muscle to contract, middle and lower centers have the opportunity to modify the
command. Lower and middle centers receive peripheral sensory feedback. Thus,
the impact of the command on the muscle will vary depending on the context and
degree of influence of the middle and lower centers. As a result, the
relationship between higher center or executive commands and muscle action is
not a one-to-one.
3.3.Dynamical
systems theory
·
Dynamical systems theory proposes that
behaviors emerge from the interaction of many systems and subsystems. Because
the behavior is not specified but is emergent, it is considered to be
self-organizing
·
Despite the many degrees of freedom or
ways of performing a task available to persons, they tend to use relatively
stable patterns of motor behavior
·
These relatively stable patterns of
motor behavior, which are unique to each person, provide evidence of
self-organization
·
It is during unstable periods, characterized
by a high variability of performance, that new types of behaviors may emerge
either gradually or abruptly. These transitions in behavior, called phase
shifts, are changes in preferred patterns of coordinated behavior to another.
4.
SYSTEMS
VIEW OF MOTOR DEVELOPMENT:
·
A systems view of motor development
suggests that changes over time are caused by multiple factors or systems such
as maturation of the nervous system, biomechanical constraints and resources,
and the impact of the physical and social environment
5. CONTEMPORARY VIEW OF MOTOR LEARNING:
·
Defined motor learning as a set of
processes associated with practice or experience leading to relatively
permanent changes in the capabilities of responding
6.
SYSTEMS
MODEL OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR:
·
Role performance (social
participation)
ü Roles:
worker, student, volunteer, home maintainer, hobbyist or amateur, participant
in organizations, friend, family member, caregiver, religious participant,
other? Identify past roles and whether they can be maintained or need to be
changed.
ü Determine
how future roles will be balanced.
·
Occupational performance tasks
(areas of occupation)
ü ADLs:
bathing, feeding, bowel and bladder management, dressing, functional mobility,
and personal hygiene and grooming
ü IADLs:
home management, meal preparation and cleanup, care of others and pets,
community mobility, shopping, financial management, and safety procedures Work
and education: employment seeking, job performance, volunteer exploration and
participation, retirement activities, and formal and informal educational
participation
ü Play
and leisure: exploration and participation
ü Rest
and sleep: preparation and participation
·
Task selection and analysis
ü What
client factors, performance skills and patterns, or contexts and activity
demands limit or enhance occupational performance?
·
Person (client factors; performance
skills and patterns)
ü Cognitive:
orientation, attention span, memory, problem solving, sequencing, calculations,
learning, and generalization
ü Psychosocial:
interests, coping skills, self-concept, interpersonal skills, self-expression,
time management, and emotional regulation and self-control
ü Sensorimotor:
strength, endurance, ROM, sensory functions and pain, perceptual function, and
postural control
·
Environment (context and activity
demands)
ü Physical:
objects, tools, devices, furniture, plants, animals, and built and natural
environment
ü Socioeconomic:
social supports: family, friends, caregivers, social groups, and community and
financial resources
ü Cultural:
customs, beliefs, activity patterns, behavior standards, and societal
expectations.
7.
EVALUATION FRAMEWORK USING THE OCCUPATIONAL
THERAPY TASK-ORIENTED APPROACH:
·
Evaluation efforts focus initially on
role performance and occupational performance tasks because they are the goals
of motor behavior.
·
Top down approach
·
Therefore, therapists use interviews,
skilled observations, and standardized assessments to evaluate their
clients.
·
The therapist may assess role
performance using a nonstandardized, semistructured interview. However,
a standardized assessment tool such as :
ü Role
Checklist
ü Occupational
Performance History Interview-II (OPHI-II
·
The evaluation process is the assessment
of occupational
performance tasks: Because roles, tasks, activities, and their contexts
are unique to each person, a client-centered assessment tool such as:
ü Canadian
Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
ü Assessment
of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS)
·
Occupational therapists use a variety of
assessments to evaluate patient factors, performance skills, and
performance patterns that support or constrain occupational performance.
ü Arnadottir
OT-ADL Neurobehavioral Evaluation (A-ONE)
8.
TREATMENT
PRINCIPLES USING THE OCCUPATIONAL
THERAPY TASK-ORIENTED APPROACH:
·
Help patients adjust to role and task
performance limitations
·
Create an environment that uses the
common challenges of everyday life
·
Practice functional tasks or close
simulations to find effective and efficient strategies for performance
·
Provide opportunities for practice outside of therapy time
·
Use contemporary motor learning
principles in training or retraining skills
·
Minimize ineffective and inefficient
movement patterns
8.1.Help
patients adjust to role and task performance limitations
ü Therapists
can help by exploring alternative ways of fulfilling roles and of performing
the associated tasks.
ü Therapists
also can explore potential new roles and new tasks
ü The
uses of compensatory strategies (i.e., adapted equipment or techniques) can be an
efficient way to address role and task performance limitations
8.2.
Create
an environment that uses the common challenges of everyday life
ü Therapists
need to be creative in creating environments within their clinical settings
that provide typical challenges. Some facilities have purchased more real-life
environments facilities have remodeled their clinics to simulate environments
in which patients typically have to interact
ü Home
care settings are ideal situations for following this treatment principle because
the patient’s own environment and objects can be used for therapy.
8.3.Practice
functional tasks or close simulations to find effective and efficient
strategies for performance
ü Persons
need to practice functional, everyday activities to find the most effective and
efficient way of doing the activity.
ü Use
of functional, natural tasks rather than rote exercise in treatment is
important
ü The
therapist must use the functional tasks and activities that have been
identified as important and meaningful to their patients. This demonstrates to
patients that the therapist has listened to them and respects their choices and
priorities. As a result, patients more easily understand the relevance of
therapy to their lives.
ü There
is strong evidence that patients benefit from exercise programmes in which
functional tasks are directly and intensively trained
8.4.Provide
opportunities for practice outside of
therapy time
ü Therapists
need to recognize that the amount of time they have to work with a patient is
short relative to the total time in a day
ü Therapists
can provide homework assignments for patients to work on their own
8.5.Use
contemporary motor learning principles in training or retraining skills
ü Use
random and variable practice within natural contexts in treatment.
ü Provide
decreasing amounts of physical guidance and verbal feedback.
ü Develop task analysis and problem-solving
skills of patients so they can find their own solutions to occupational
performance problems in home and community environments.
8.6.Minimize
ineffective and inefficient movement patterns
ü A patient performing an occupational
performance task, therapists attempt to identify what may be critical personal
or environmental factors that are interfering with effective and efficient
movement patterns
ü The following strategies are ways
that therapists can intervene to reduce ineffective and inefficient movement.
Ø Remediate a client factor
(impairment) if it is the critical control parameter.
When therapists identify person factors in the cognitive, psychosocial, or
sensorimotor systems as possible critical control parameters, then they should
attempt to remediate those factors, assuming it is possible.
Ø Adapt the environment, modify the
task, use assistive technology, or reduce the effects of gravity.
For many patients, the quickest and most effective approach to improving
occupational performance is to adapt the task or the environment.
Ø For persons with poor control of
movement, constrain the degrees of freedom. Persons
learning a new task initially restrict the degrees of freedom at their joints
by selfimposing some form of freezing of body segments. as a result, their
performance appears stiff and uncoordinated. With practice, the performance
becomes smoother and more coordinated as the restrictions on the degrees of
freedom decrease
Ø For persons who do not use returned
function in their involved extremities, use constraint-induced therapy
9.
COMPARISON
OF THE NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL AND TASK ORIENTED APPROACH
|
Neurophysiological
approach
|
Task oriented
approach
|
Models of
motor control
|
Reflex – hierarchial
·
Movement are elicited by sensory or controlled by
central programs
·
Open loop and closed loop control is used
·
Feedback and feed forward influence movement
·
Central nervous system {CNS} is hierarchically
organized with centers controlling lower center
·
Reciprocal innervation is essential for
coordinated movement
|
Systems
·
Personal and environmental systems interact to
achieve functional goals
·
Movement emerges from the interaction of many
systems
·
Systems are dynamical ,self organizing and
heterrarchial
·
Movement used for a task is the preferred means
for achieving a functional goal
·
Changes in one or more systems can alter behavior
|
Theories of
motor development
|
Neuromaturational
·
Changes are due to CNS maturation
·
Development follows a predictable sequence
·
CNS damage lead to regression to lower levels and
more stereotypical behavior’s
|
System
·
Changes are due to interaction of multiple systems
·
Progression varies because person and environment
context are unique
·
CNS damage leads to attempts to use remaining
resources to achieve functional
goal
|
Assumptions of therapeutic approach
|
·
CNS is hierarhially organized
·
Sensory stimuli inhibit spasticity and abnormal
movement and facilitate normal movement and postural response
·
Repetition of movement result in positive
permanent changes in CNS
·
Recovery from CNS damage follows a predictable
sequence
·
Behavioural changes after CNS damage have a neurophysiological
basis
|
·
Personal and environmental systems, including the
central nervous system, are hierarchically organized.
·
Functional tasks help organize behavior.
·
Occupational performance emerges from the
interaction of persons and his or her environment.
·
Experimentation with various strategies leads to
optimal solutions to motor problems.
·
Recovery is variable because patient factors and
environmental contexts are unique.
·
Behavioral changes reflect attempts to compensate
and to achieve task performance.
|
Evaluation
|
Primary focus on performance
components
·
Abnormal muscle tone
·
Abnormal reflexes and stereotypical movement
patterns lead to incoordination
·
Postural control
·
Sensation and perception
·
Memory and judgment
·
Stage of recovery or developmental level
|
Primary focus on role and occupational
performance using a client centered view
·
Task
analysis to determine performance component and context that limit function
and to identify preferred movements patterns for specific tasks in varied
contexts
·
Variables that cause transitions to new patterns
|
|
Secondary focus on occupational
performance
|
Secondary focus on selected
occupational performance components and contexts that limit function
|
Comments