COGNITIVE MODEL
COGNITIVE MODEL
1. THEORY:
·
Defines cognition as a process of identifying,
selecting, interpreting, storing, and using information to make sense of and
interact with the physical and social world, to conduct one’s everyday
activities, and to plan and enact occupational life
·
Cognition
includes:
ü
Higher-level
processes (metacognition) of awareness (ability to perceive oneself in
relatively objective terms) and executive functions (e.g., identifying,
initiating and pursuing goals, planning strategies and sequencing steps of
action, solving problems, monitoring progress, and adjusting behavior to
circumstances
ü
Specific
or basic cognitive functions (e.g. attention, concentration, memory)
·
Cognition
is part of a mind-body system in which cognitive functions cannot be understood
fully without reference to the motor system
·
Cognition
involves a long developmental process influenced by social mediation
·
A
central aspect of cognition is information processing through three distinct
stages:
ü
Sensory-perceptual
memory (the recall of sensory information [e.g., sight, sound, touch] just long
enough for it to be analyzed and filtered)
ü
Short-term
working memory (what one is thinking about at the moment)
ü
Long-term memory (information that is
available for recall over an indefinite period)
·
Cognition
is dynamic and results from multiple factors both inside and outside of the
person interacting together
2. PROBLEMS
AND CHALLENGES:
·
Most
cognitive approaches are concerned with difficulties relating to structuring,
organizing, and using information for task performance (in a specific area such
as visual processing or more generalized)
·
Cognitive problems may include difficulties
with:
ü
Selecting
and using efficient processing strategies to organize and structure incoming
information
ü
Anticipating,
monitoring, and verifying accuracy of performance
ü
Accessing
previous knowledge when needed
ü
Flexibly
applying knowledge and skills to different situations (Toglia, 2005)
·
Cognitive
problems:
ü
Are
dependent on task and environmental context
ü
Routinely
lead to problems in occupational performance
3. RATIONALE
FOR THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTION:
·
The
explanation for cognitive interventions falls into two major categories:
ü
Remedial
(sometimes referred to as restorative) Aims to retrain or restore specific
cognitive skills Used with persons with
greater capacity for learning, with more intact higher-level cognitive
processes and the ability to transfer learning
·
Compensatory (sometimes referred to as
adaptive)
ü
Helps
persons to capitalize on their existing potentials
ü
Applies
to clients who have less capacity for learning
ü
Three types of compensatory interventions
Ø
Process-oriented
and dynamic strategy learning (learning to compensate for their problems using
their remaining abilities)
Ø
Specific skill training (teaching a very
specific compensatory strategy or a specific functional task)
Ø
Task
and environmental modification (identifying the extent of cognitive limitation
and adapting tasks and environment accordingly)
4. PRACTICE
RESOURCES ASSESSMENT:
·
The
main strategies of cognitive assessment are:
ü
Assessment
of the occupational/functional consequences of impaired cognition
ü
Assessment
of cognitive components to identify the extent and nature of underlying
cognitive deficits to understand why performance is breaking down
ü
Dynamical
assessment that reflects the principle that person, task, and environmental
variables all contribute together to cognition
ü
Determination of level of cognitive
impairment/function
·
Specific assessment methods include:
ü
Observation
during task performance (to note processing strategies, functional impairment,
and overall cognitive level)
ü
Interview (to gather information on the
client’s awareness of cognitive impairments, lifestyle, and narrative)
ü
Standardized
tests (verbal, paper and pencil, and tabletop) that range from screening for
cognitive problems, determining cognitive level (extent of impairment), and
assessing specific cognitive abilities, to examining multiple cognitive factors
5. INTERVENTION:
·
Remedial treatment of awareness problems
includes:
ü
Providing
information to the client on impairment
ü
Helping
the client experience the impairment in activities that highlight problems but
do not overwhelm the client
ü
Using the therapeutic relationship to help the
client to acknowledge and face emotionally difficult information about
impairment Remedial treatment of
executive functions involves providing persons with opportunities to choose,
select, plan, and self-correct
·
Compensatory
approach to
awareness stresses environmental adaptations and using behavioral techniques to
extinguish maladaptive behaviors stemming from unawareness Compensatory approach involves providing
external support or strategies to allow adequate performance
·
Dynamical strategy treatment is
based on the principle that performance can be modified by changing:
ü
Activity
demands
ü
Environment
ü
Person’s
use of strategies and self-awareness
ü
Task and environmental dimensions that create
difficulty for the client as well as information-processing difficulties that
create problems across different kinds of tasks
·
Cognitive
Retraining
ü
Mostly
remedial approach designed for persons with stroke and traumatic brain injury
ü
Aims
to improve: Capacity to process information Ability to transfer and generalize
to functional areas Awareness of
abilities
ü
Uses the following methods: Enhancing
remaining abilities through supports to maximize success and minimize frustration
Individual or group training Using specific, structured teaching learning
strategies Training in procedural
strategies
·
Neurofunctional
Training
ü
For
clients with severe cognitive impairments
ü
Uses two main compensatory strategies:
Ø
Training
in highly specific (task and/or context) compensatory strategies
Ø
Specific task training to assist clients to
perform a given functional behavior
·
Dynamic
Cognitive Intervention
ü
Combines
remedial and compensatory interventions that directly and simultaneously enhance
participation while seeking to improve and expand learning ability and
self-perception
ü
The
mediator (therapist) aims to: Increase intentionality and raise awareness of
the ways one acts Help go beyond immediate needs or concerns to make
generalizations Raise the awareness and
understanding, making explicit the reasons and motivations for doing
things Support a sense of competence and
ability in task performance
·
Cognitive
Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP)
ü
A
cognitive intervention for improving motor performance in children with
developmental coordination disorder
ü
Uses a global strategic sequence of
identifying a goal, planning, doing, and checking
ü
Emphasizes talking and uses a process of
guided discovery that seeks to scaffold learning
6.
TYPES
OF COGNITIVE MODEL :
|
APPROACH/INTER-VIEW
OF AUTHOR(S)
|
[INTENDED
DISCIPLINARY
|
VIEW
OF COGNITION
|
VIEW
OF IMPAIRMENT/PROBLEMS
|
ASSESSMENT
STRATEGY
|
INTERVENTION
APPROACH
|
1
|
cognitive
Rehabilitation
(Averbach &
Katz) [stroke and
TBI]
|
Incorporates
ideas of neuro-plasticity
|
Through learning
and experience one can: (1) improve ability to evaluate and be aware of
abilities and avoid entering situations beyond one’s capacities, (2) create
alternative cognitive strategies
|
|
Assess cognitive
abilities/disabilities, level of awareness and executive functioning
abilities, occupational information, and preferred learning patterns
|
Broaden capacity
to process information, transfer, and generalize to functional areas
|
2
|
Neurofunctional
Approach
(Giles) [clients
with several cognitive deficits]
|
Behavioral and
cognitive theories of learning, movement science, and OT, dynamical systems
perspective
|
|
In clients with
severe cognitive impairment, learning potential is very constrained by
inability to generalize and use higher-order compensatory skills. Learning
must be specific, clearly guided, and practiced until highly habituated to
result
|
Determine current
level of functioning under conditions similar to expected living situation.
Standardized testing can be used to identify specific reasons why performance
may break down
|
Training in
highly specific compensatory strategies. Assist performance of a specific
functional behavior through specific task training
|
3
|
Cognitive
Orientation to daily Occupational Performance
(Polatajko &
Mandich
[children with
developmental coordination disorder]
|
|
Thinking patterns
drive behavior and new thinking patterns can result in behavior change. New
skills emerge from the interaction of the child, the task, and the
environment
|
Does not describe
cognitive impairments, as cognition is used as a strategy for addressing
performance difficulties due to motor coordination problems
|
Daily activity
log. Activity card sort (things done and not done). COPM. Performance Quality
Rating scale: observation scale for repeatedly measuring performance and
change (research tool). Dynamic performance analysis (observation-based
process of identify performance problems or performance breakdown)
|
CO-OP is a
client-centered, performance-based, problem-solving approach that enables
skill acquisition. It uses: (1) a strategic sequence of identifying a goal,
planning, doing, and checking, and (2) a process of guided discovery in which
the child is supported to find out how to do the task at hand
|
4
|
Dynamic Cognitive
Intervention
(Hadas-Lidor
& Weiss) [all
populations]
|
Luria’s and
Feuresten’s notion that cognition is influenced by social mediation
|
Cognition is
shaped and mediated by learning experiences (i.e., how stimuli emitted by the
environment are transformed by a mediating agent [e.g., parent] who selects,
frames, filters, and schedules stimuli)
|
Low performance
is linked to learned cognitive structures that can be more important than
cognitive impairment due to etiological factors
|
Focuses on
modifiability of cognition and attempts to understand cognitive functions responsible
for deficiencies in cognition (which may be motivational, emotional, as well
as cognitive)
|
Change cognitive
structures that determine low performance through mediated learning
experience. Seeks to transform client into an autonomous independent thinker
capable of initiating and elaborating actions
|
|
Cognitive
Disabilities
(Allen, Levy,
& Burns)
[severe psychiatric illness, dementia]
|
Originally based
on Piaget’s concepts of cognition. Reformulated emerging theory and concepts
from cognitive neuroscience
|
Based on a
conceptualization of information processing, offers a hierarchical
description of different levels of functional performance capabilities and
limitations
|
Neurological
injury or disease impairs cognition, imposing restrictions on performance and
learning potential
|
Identify/monitor
level of cognitive function based on an ordinal classification scheme that
identifies six levels of cognitive functioning
|
Centers on
current capabilities, providing the just-right challenge, and adapting the
task and environment to the individual
|
5
|
Dynamic
Interactional Approach
(Toglia
|
Dynamical systems
theory
|
Cognition is a
product of the dynamic interaction among the person, activity, and
environment
|
Examines
abilities and problems in terms of underlying strategies, ability to monitor
performance, and potential for learning
|
Use cues and task
alterations to identify a person’s potential for change. Alter task and
environmental variables to enhance ability to process, monitor, and use
information
|
Remedial: change
the person’s strategies and self-awareness. Compensatory: modify external
factors such as activity demands and environment or simultaneously focus on
person, task, and environment systematically
|
6
|
Higher-Level
Cognition ( Katz &
Hartman
Maeir
|
Interdisciplinary
literature of higher-level cognitive functions
|
Focus on
higher-level cognition: awareness and executive functions
|
Unawareness of
limitations. Difficulties with executive functions (planning, problemsolving,
monitoring, and adjusting performance
|
Awareness.
Compare client’s
estimation of ability, prediction of performance with actual abilities/
performance; examine on-line awareness to choose appropriate tasks and
detect/ correct errors.
Executive
functions. Use a battery that combines tabletop, functional, and
observational measures
|
Awareness.
Remedial (for mild-to-moderate unawareness): educate client or allow client
to experience impairment in task performance, provide support to face
emotionally difficult information.
Compensatory:
environmental adaptations and behavior approaches.
Executive
functions. Remedial: provide persons with opportunities to choose, select,
plan, and self-correct. Compensatory: provide external support or strategies
|
7
|
Quadraphonic
Approach
(Abreu)
|
Information
processing, teaching-learning, neurodevelopment and biomechanics, and
narrative concepts
|
Stresses the
mindbody connection (i.e., the relationship of cognition and the motor
system) and the life history context in which cognition occurs
|
Disruption of
cognitive and motor systems with impact on client’s life story
|
Micro evaluation:
cognitive and motor control strategies, assessment of cognitive processes
(e.g., attention, memory, problem-solving, motor planning). Macro evaluation:
the client’s subjective sense of satisfaction and adaptation. Identifies
client’s level of functional performance (seven levels)
|
Focus on the
client-learner, therapist-teacher, and training-compensatory environment.
Emphasis of intervention is based on client’s functional performance level
and integrates cognition, movement, and client’s personal narrative. Approach
depends on client’s functional level
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments